Paul McCartney, Nirvana members jam at '121212' concert

Paul McCartney, left, jams with drummer Dave Grohl and guitarist Pat Smear at "121212: The Concert for Sandy Relief" benefit in New York. (Dave Allocca / Associated Press-Starpix)

The reunion of the three surviving members of Nirvana with guest singer Paul McCartney for the “121212: The Concert for Sandy Relief” brought the first live performance of a new song they’d created together while jamming recently, the ex-Beatle said on introducing “Cut Me Some Slack” during their time together at Madison Square Garden.

“Recently, some guys asked me to go jam with them,” McCartney told the crowd. “So I showed up, like you do, ready to jam. And in the middle of it, these guys kept going, ‘We haven’t played together for years.’ So the penny finally dropped, I finally understood I was in the middle of a Nirvana reunion.”

The new song, not surprisingly, is a driving rock workout with a heavy backbeat full of distortion-drenched electric guitar work by Pat Smear in tandem with stinging slide guitar leads by McCartney, a sonic assault not far removed from one of the Beatles’ signature hard rockers, “Helter Skelter.”

A bit more surprisingly, McCartney’s instrumental contribution came on a humble cigar-box guitar he played with a slide. The guitar, as it happens, was made here in the Southland by cigar-box guitar aficionado Matty Baratto, whose Cigfiddle creations were featured in a story I wrote last year about a modern-day revival of interest in the homespun cigar-box guitar tradition.

Baratto’s instruments have made their way into other famous hands, including those of Keith Richards and Johnny Depp, and present-day cigar-box players also include ZZ Top’s Billy Gibbons and rocker Steve Miller.

After devoting himself on his recent “Kisses on the Bottom” album to songs largely drawn from the pre-rock era of classic pop, perhaps McCartney’s next project will be “The Cigar Box Collection.”
With his own  band, McCartney dipped into the Beatles' catalog for "Helter Skelter," "Blackbird" and "I've Got a Feeling" and turned to his solo repertoire for "Live and Let Die," "Let Me Roll It" and "Nineteen Hundred and Eighty Five." He also included "My Valentine," an original from the "Kisses" album that featured Diana Krall.

Related searches: Nirvana, 121212concert

Politics Meets The Plastics: Welcome to the Mean Girls of Capitol Hill Tumblr

Posted in Congress, D.C., funny, government, Humor, movie, news, politicians, Politics, slideshow, Tumblr, Washington
As much crap as I may get from my male friends, I think I’m finally comfortable with my own self-identity to finally announce to the online world that…YES, I am a huge fan of the movie Mean Girls. Hate it or love it, that movie is downright hilarious. Considering it came out right about the time I was finishing high school, the timing of the movie couldn’t be better and the fact it was written by the comedic genius that is Tina Fey only solidified the fact it would be a film that would always hold a special place in my heart.

My affinity for the movie and it’s memorable quotes is probably one of the driving forces as to why I fell in love with one of D.C.’s newest Tumblrs, “Mean Girls of Capitol Hill“. Like many “gov-related” Tumblrs, it combines the nerdiness of politics with components from current pop-culture zeitgeist to make both funny and relevant jokes about politicians. In the particular case of this Tumblr, it grabs some of my favorite quotes from the movie Mean Girls and combines it with pictures of politicians to make pithy, witty jokes that probably only people in my age demographic would laugh at. The Tumblr itself is the brainchild of Ellie Hall, a former NBC News staffer and prolific Tumblr user. Hall is slated to start working for BuzzFeed as a reporter in January, and judging by her other successful pop-culture mashup Tumblrs such as Arrested Decision 2012 and Barack the Legi-Slayer, it comes at no surprise she snagged a gig working for the funniest people online.

Since I’m sure all of you Mean Girls fans/politics nerds out there want to jump straight to the good stuff, I won’t hold you back: here are a few of my favorite memes from the Mean Girls of Capitol Hill.


Rick Snyder: Right To Work Bills Signed Into Law In Michigan


WASHINGTON -- Gov. Rick Snyder (R) officially made Michigan a "right-to-work" state on Tuesday, signing into law two bills that significantly diminish the power of unions.

"I have signed these bills into law. ... We are moving forward on the topic of workplace fairness and equality," he said at a press conference on Tuesday evening, just hours after the state House passed the bills.
Right-to-work laws forbid contracts between companies and unions that require all workers to pay the union for bargaining on their behalf. Although business groups and conservatives cast the issue in terms of workplace freedom, unions note that the laws allow workers to opt out of supporting the union although they reap the benefits of the collective bargaining. Since the laws tend to weaken unions generally, unions, as well as President Barack Obama, call the legislation "right to work for less."

Snyder's move is a particular victory for right-to-work proponents. Most right-to-work states are solidly red and in the south. Michigan, however, has one of the highest rates of unionization in the country, is the birthplace of the modern automotive industry, and is consistently a swing state in elections and went for Obama in 2012.

Throughout the day, at least 12,500 protesters showed up at the Capitol in Lansing. The gathering occasionally turned ugly, with punches thrown and pepper spray dispersed.

The GOP-controlled state legislature had fast-tracked the two bills, which authorize right-to-work measures for public and private unions in the state, bypassing the normal committee process and public input period.

Even before Snyder signed the bills, labor unions were investigating ways to possibly repeal them. Labor officials were largely taken off-guard by the rapid push for right to work, believing that Snyder was sincere in his negotiations with them to keep it off his desk.

The governor repeatedly said he didn't want right to work on the agenda, arguing it would be incredibly divisive in the state. In his press conference on Tuesday, Snyder blamed unions' actions for the reason he signed the bill, pointing to their pushing of Proposal 2. The ballot measure, which would have enshrined collective bargaining rights in the state constitution, was rejected by voters in November.

"The timing of such is something I didn't seek out," he said. "But really what took place this summer with Proposal 2 triggered the dialogue and discussion on this. I asked labor leaders not to move forward with a ballot proposal because I knew it could trigger a discussion that could lead to right to work being a divisive issue. Unfortunately they moved forward, it became divisive, and it was time to step up and take a leadership position, which I believe I've done, with good teamwork in the legislature."

Previewing the divisiveness that is likely to plague the state politically going forward, National Action Network Michigan civil rights leader Rev. Charles Williams III said in a statement sent out by SEIU, " Because good jobs and so much else is at stake, we will not rest until workers’ rights to a fair and decent wage are restored. Everything is on the table during the next two years.”

Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.), a vocal opponent of right to work who met with the governor to urge him to veto the bills, quickly sent out a statement saying the push to repeal the law needed to begin immediately.

“The effort to reverse this wrong-headed action and restore a Michigan that encourages middle class jobs and race to the top for its workers -– not a crash to the bottom –- begins today," he said.

"Gov. Snyder showed his true colors today: He's a puppet of extreme donors, and he is willing to ignore and lie to his constituents," added AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka. "His action will undoubtedly please the Koch Brothers and corporate CEOs, but it will diminish the voice of every working man and woman in Michigan."

Related searches: Right To Work States

Michigan enacts right to work law, dealing blow to unions


Michigan enacted far-reaching legislation Tuesday that threatens to cripple the power of organized labor in a state that was a hub of union might during the heyday of the nation’s industrial dominance.

As thousands of angry union members shouted their opposition outside the state Capitol in Lansing, the
Republican-controlled legislature completed work on two measures to ban unions from requiring workers to pay membership dues. Gov. Rick Snyder (R) then signed them into law Tuesday evening.

The “right to work” effort illustrates the power of Republicans to use state legislative majorities won in 2010 to pursue their policy preferences, even after losing a bitter presidential election.
The defeat is devastating for organized labor, which for decades has been waging an uphill battle against declining membership and dwindling influence.

But it also strikes at the roots of a Democratic Party that relied on unions for financial support and to marshal voters for President Obama’s reelection.

The new law comes nearly two years after Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) began a push to curb collective bargaining rights for public employees. That effort ignited huge protests from union and liberal activists and triggered a failed effort to recall Walker.

At the same time, a well-funded campaign to curtail union power swept through several other Republican-controlled states in the industrial Midwest.

Indiana followed Wisconsin and passed laws that limited the reach of organized labor. Lawmakers in Ohio also passed legislation that curtailed collective bargaining rights of public sector unions, but voters overturned it.

In crafting Michigan’s measure, supporters avoided some tactical errors from earlier efforts. The measure is
attached to an appropriations bill, which exempts it from being taken to a referendum. And it excludes firefighters and police, groups that were critical in overturning Ohio’s law.

Proponents call their win in Michigan especially significant because the state is the birthplace of one of the country’s most powerful labor groups, the United Auto Workers. Founded in 1935, the union organized auto workers, winning wages and benefits that transformed assembly-line work into solid middle-class jobs.

“This is really a message to every other state that is a closed union shop, that if you do it here you can do it everywhere else,” said Scott Hagerstrom, Michigan director of Americans for Prosperity. The group is supported by industrialists Charles and David Koch, billionaires who have pushed for anti-union and other conservative measures.

Supporters predicted that the new law will be a boon to economic growth in an era of global competition. But unions say the measure will starve them of money, weakening their ability to bargain for their members and undercutting their ability to support Democratic political candidates, who typically back their causes.
Labor leaders and Democratic state legislators said they had requested that Obama weigh in on the labor fight. They asked the White House to issue a public statement last week declaring the president’s opposition to the legislation, and for him to refer to the labor fight in his remarks Monday during a visit to Redford, Mich.

“You know, these so-called right-to-work laws, they don’t have to do with economics. They have everything to do with politics,” Obama said. “What they’re really talking about is giving you the right to work for less money.”

Labor Department figures show that unionized workers earn more and have better benefits than their non-union counterparts. But the number of American workers who are in labor unions is in sharp decline.

In Michigan, the share of unionized workers has dropped from 28.4 percent to 17.5 percent since 1985. Meanwhile, the nation’s struggle to hold on to manufacturing jobs and the travails of the auto industry made Michigan an economic basket case long before the recession. After the downturn hit, unemployment in the state peaked at 14.2 percent and now stands at 9.1 percent, far above the national average.

With increasing numbers of working Americans who must make do with falling wages, frozen pensions and long periods of joblessness, it is unclear whether they consider unions their allies.

The Michigan vote ended a swift change of fortune for the forces of organized labor there. Unions and their supporters spent more than $22 million to back a ballot measure last month that would have guaranteed collective bargaining rights in the state Constitution, only to see it resoundingly defeated.

The rejection emboldened the other side. Sensing an opening, supporters pushed to have the legislature pass the right-to-work measure. Then Snyder, who had previously expressed ambivalence, came out in favor of it.
Greg McNeilly, who heads the Michigan Freedom Fund, a group backed by multimillionaire conservative activist Dick DeVos that spent millions pressing for passage of the legislation, called their success a potentially decisive hit against organized labor.

“I think today is their Waterloo,” McNeilly said. “To see the birthplace of forced unionization do a turnabout
is a very monumental achievement, and it is historic.”

At a news conference Tuesday at the George W. Romney Building steps away from the state Capitol, Snyder defended his move as one that would lead to “more jobs coming to Michigan.”

“I view this as simply trying to get this issue behind us,” he said of his decision to sign the measures. “And I recognize that people are going to be upset. There’ll be a continuation. But hopefully what’s really going to transpire over time is you’re going to see workers making a choice and you’ll see unions being held more accountable and responsive.”

Researchers are divided about whether such laws fuel job creation. Sylvia Allegretto, an economist at the University of California at Berkeley, said a similar law that was passed in Oklahoma in 2001 did not improve the labor market.
Meanwhile, the average worker — unionized or not — in a right-to-work state earns $1,500 less per year than a similar worker in a state without such a law, according to the liberal Center for American Progress.
But conservative researchers argue that right-to-work states have done better at attracting investment and jobs than have more heavily unionized states. The West Michigan Policy Forum, a research group that supported the right-to-work bills, said that of the 10 states with the highest rate of personal income growth, eight have right-to-work laws.
Whatever the impact, union leaders promised to work hard to overturn Tuesday’s actions.
“What this means is that for the next two years, we are going to work hard to elect candidates who support the middle class and working class and see what we can do to get this bill turned over,” said Michael Bolton, director of United Steel Workers District 2, which covers Wisconsin and Michigan.


Philip Rucker, Peter Whoriskey and Felicia Sonmez contributed to this report.

Related searches: Right To Work States

Man Of Steel Trailer: Superman Is Ready For The World (VIDEO)



"Man Of Steel" is one of Warner Brothers' biggest 2013 releases, so it goes to reason that a new trailer for the film will come attached to prints of "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey." Not that you need to enter Middle-earth to see the latest teaser: The "Man of Steel" trailer is online and -- to quote Teri Hatcher -- it's spectacular.
Directed by Zack Snyder and produced by Christopher Nolan, "Man of Steel" recalls the oft-recounted origin story for Superman. As the first teasers hinted at, however, this isn't necessarily your pa's Man of Steel: Snyder's film appears to have the earthy look of a Terrence Malick feature mixed with the gravitas of Nolan's well-regarded Batman trilogy.

Henry Cavill stars as Superman, here presented with various stages of facial-hair growth. Kevin Costner and Diane Lane play the Kents, Russell Crowe is Superman's alien father, Michael Shannon is General Zod (though Snyder won't confirm that) and Amy Adams appears as Lois Lane. All get glimpsed at in the "Man of Steel" trailer, which includes enough epic money shots to be worthy of what fans hope is a franchise saving reboot; "Superman Returns," the last Superman film, was rejected by both critics and audiences, despite earning nearly $400 million around the globe.

"My father believed that if the world found out who I really was, they would reject me," Cavill-as-Supes says at the crescendo of the trailer. "He was convinced that the world wasn't ready. What do you think?"
So, what do you think? Watch above and sound off in the comments section below.

Related searches: Man Of Steel Trailer

Superman unleashed: The new trailer for ‘Man of Steel’ arrives



"Man Of Steel" is one of Warner Brothers' biggest 2013 releases, so it goes to reason that a new trailer for the film will come attached to prints of "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey." Not that you need to enter Middle-earth to see the latest teaser: The "Man of Steel" trailer is online and -- to quote Teri Hatcher -- it's spectacular.
Directed by Zack Snyder and produced by Christopher Nolan, "Man of Steel" recalls the oft-recounted origin story for Superman. As the first teasers hinted at, however, this isn't necessarily your pa's Man of Steel: Snyder's film appears to have the earthy look of a Terrence Malick feature mixed with the gravitas of Nolan's well-regarded Batman trilogy.

Henry Cavill stars as Superman, here presented with various stages of facial-hair growth. Kevin Costner and Diane Lane play the Kents, Russell Crowe is Superman's alien father, Michael Shannon is General Zod (though Snyder won't confirm that) and Amy Adams appears as Lois Lane. All get glimpsed at in the "Man of Steel" trailer, which includes enough epic money shots to be worthy of what fans hope is a franchise saving reboot; "Superman Returns," the last Superman film, was rejected by both critics and audiences, despite earning nearly $400 million around the globe.

"My father believed that if the world found out who I really was, they would reject me," Cavill-as-Supes says at the crescendo of the trailer. "He was convinced that the world wasn't ready. What do you think?"
So, what do you think? Watch above and sound off in the comments section below.

Tom Brady is latest elite passer to expose fraudulent Texans pass defense

FOXBOROUGH, Mass. – As has been his habit through the years, New England Patriots great Tom Brady punctuated a particularly satisfying play by punching his fist in the air. This bit of gesticulation came on the final play of the third quarter Monday night against the big, burly Houston Texans, a team that had cut a swath through the AFC to this point.

Brady, who last week welcomed the birth of his third child, was more like Juan Manuel Marquez landing the perfect punch on Manny Pacquiao on Saturday night. In fact, the Patriots (10-3) landed punch after punch against Houston as they walked away with a 42-14 win.

This is the kind of game that makes you wonder if Houston will be able to pick itself off the canvas. As impressive as Houston had generally been in piling up what is now an 11-2 record and control of the No. 1 seed in the AFC, there is an issue plaguing the Texans that's as open and obvious as Pacquiao's unguarded face at the moment Marquez struck.

The Texans can't defend the pass, especially when the passer is of Brady's ilk. In three games against Brady, Aaron Rodgers of Green Bay (another team that put up 42 on Houston) and Denver's Peyton Manning, the Texans have gotten lit up like a Christmas tree. They have allowed 12 touchdown passes and gotten zero interceptions in those three contests, two resulting in losses. In this game, Brady finished 21 of 35 for 296 yards and four TDs. Earlier this season, Rodgers was 24-of-37 for 338 yards and six TDs in a 42-24 win.


Even more, Detroit's Matthew Stafford and Jacksonville's Chad Henne threw a combined six TDs and no interceptions against Houston in back-to-back overtime games last month. Those numbers are going to radiate like a scarlet letter for the Texans until they can prove otherwise.

"No question, we're going to get asked that question," Houston safety Danieal Manning said. "We're going to get that about how they were able to tear through our defense until we do something about it. We all know that."

Linebacker Connor Barwin tried to downplay the issue, saying the Texans wouldn't "blow this one out of proportion."

The problem is, the media will.
"That's a good point and that's a fair question until we beat those guys," Barwin said.
Defensive tackle J.J. Watt summed it up best when he politely told a group of reporters in the hallway under Gillette Stadium, "Not now" as he didn't even break stride on the way to the team bus.

At this rate, the Texans will be lucky to avoid a one-and-done playoff appearance if they don't make fixes in a hurry. One silver lining is that they might not have to face New England or Denver again until the AFC championship game if Baltimore continues to fade and ends up with the No. 4 seed.
 But what happened to the Texans on Monday night goes way beyond playoff seeding and strategy. It's the kind of game that can gnaw at the confidence of the most proud team. By the early part of the second quarter, the Texans stood on the sidelines with the lifeless look of a team that didn't quite get what was happening.

Sure, the Texans created some of these problems with a rash of mistakes. From their opening play – a 5-yard penalty for illegal formation that negated a good run by Arian Foster – Houston played like a team out of sync.

"The first play of the game and you mess that up after practicing all week?" Houston head coach Gary Kubiak asked, rhetorically.

In a word, that's disconcerting. The Texans made it worse later on when they failed to recover a fumble on New England's first touchdown drive. Those early errors started a landslide that had the Texans down 21-0 by early in the second quarter.
"They make you look really bad … if you're not on top of your stuff," Kubiak said.


Barwin again tried to minimize the disastrous outing, saying, "We just weren't opportunistic." Yeah, as if a couple of plays might have changed everything. The reality was put better later on when Barwin was pushed about what the team could do differently.

"Well, we know we can … " Barwin stopped in mid-sentence, not exactly sure how to fill in the rest of that statement. Finally, he said simply, "We didn't play our best."
The deeper question with three weeks to play is whether Houston's best is good enough.